About Me

Name: Tomás Aquinas
Location: La Junta, CO
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

The Methane Collector and the US Senate

We were sitting at the table outside The Holy Land Quickee's. We had just finished the northern loop over to Rocky Vegas and back along the south side of US 50. We were 're-hydrating'.

DinkyDau Billy came skidding up on his LiteSpeed Ghisallo. He was decked out in some kind of ...'equipment'.

He had what appeared to be a compressed air cannister on his back, a solar panel atop his AFDB - which he had taken to wearing again after the Sotomayor nomination and the Pelosi dustup over the CIA. A hose ran from a small compressor atop the canister. The other end was tucked under his cycling shorts in the back.

"Hey! Hey!" he shouted, as he came to a shuddering stop in a cloud of dust.

"Hey yourself, Billy," replied Leece, as she chugged a liter of water in decidedly unladylike fashion.

"What's that on your back?" asked Tookie, as she nibbled some chocolate-covered espresso beans.

"It's my contribution to the Climate Bill," he revealed. He gave the hose a little tug and wiggled his butt as he sat down.

"Uh...where was the other end of that hose?" I asked him.

"Well...that's my methane collector," he shared.

That didn't really answer the question, but I had an idea of where it had been.

"Tell us about that. It looks like you have been inventing again," observed Leece.

"Yeah. Yeah. Well, here's the deal. You know how the Dems and some of the more gutless Repubs passed that Climate Bill in the House?" he asked.

"Yes, we are aware of that," Leece replied, "I have heard it described as about as useful and as about as intelligent as the Congress attempting to reduce gravity by 10% so as to overcome the negative health effects of obesity and subsequent draining of Medicare benefits."

"Uh ... yeah. But here's how it works. You see, I plug this end of the hose into a biological methane source ..." he explained.

"You mean you stick it up your butt," snickered Tookie.

"Well ... yeah. In the Real World it would be on a cow or a pig or a sheep or somethin', " he went on, "and this little compressor saves the gas in this cannister, which can be emptied into a larger tank. The solar panel keeps the pump runnin'."

Livestock, especially cattle, are considered primary sources of methane, a contributor to Global Warming. There were rumors that Congress would be banning beef in an amendment to the Climate Bill, but so far that had not panned out.

"I'm gonna get aholt a Mark Youdall and Mike Bennet, and see if I can't get them to make this thing 'required by law' in the Senate version a the Climate Bill," he told us.

"You're going to ask them to add your methane collector to the senate version of the Climate Bill." It was a statement, not a question. Leece was looking at Billy with that infamous raised eyebrow.

"Well yeah. I kin sweeten the pot, too. I'll cut 'em in on the take. Ten percent goes into their campaign funds," he explained.

"Net or gross?" asked Tookie.

"Hey ... you guys are talking about bribing a couple of senators!" Leece was indignant.

"Well, yeah, but they's Democrats, so it ain't a bribe. With all the Hopin' and Changin' goin' on, I don't see how you could consider it a bribe." Billy was equally indignant.

"I can think of a few Republicans who would suck at the end of that tube, too," I said.

They all looked at me. With a look of indignation.

"What?"

"That's gross," Tookie said.

"The whole thing is gross. They're going to pass a bill that will raise utility bills and costs of production and therefore the cost of goods across the board," I explained.

"No, it won't, " argued Tookie.

"Why not?"

"Because China isn't bound by any such restrictions. China isn't bound by the Kyoto Accords. They are building dirty coal plants at an astronomical rate. They can produce goods unrestricted by Pollyanna-ish do-gooders in the US Congress. Since the biggest source of Walmart's - America's Favorite Place to Shop - goods is China, it's obvious the only businesses that will be hurt are American businesses selling goods produced in this country."

"So the onliest ones gittin' screwed is We the People," Billy opined, "since The Chinaman is exempt."

"Ah. I see," I said, "so perhaps we should sent one of these methane collectors to each of our senators and CongressClowns, since they are producing huge quantities of gas."

"And it's solid by-product," Billy threw in.

"Except for John Salazar, who voted against the House version, " Leece argued.

"I wonder why?"

Indeed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Supremes reverse Sotomayor

Court rules for white firefighters

The US Supreme Court reversed Sotomayor in the New Haven discrimination case.

Basically, the firefighters passed the test presented by the city, and should have been promoted.

But they were not. The city threw out the test and the test results because too many minorities did not score very well on the test.

Actually, the real reason was that the City of New Haven was afraid - crapping their drawers, if you really want to know - that the minorities who didn't do well on the test would sue. To avoid that, the city threw out the test. There was no demonstration that the test was in fact discriminatory toward anyone.

So the white guys sued.

Here's the deal. If the test was discriminatory - and tests can be discriminatory - then the city should have been challenged on that basis. That would have been a proper challenge. Whether or not that challenge would have been sustained is another matter.

But the city didn't have the cojones to stand that, or even risk it, so they screwed the white firefighters instead, and boy howdy were they ever surprised when those guys sued. White meat ain't supposed to be suin' over discrimination.

Can't win for losin', hey?

In the high-profile, controversial case, white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., argued they were discriminated against when the city tossed out the results of a promotion exam because too few minorities scored high enough on it. Justice Anthony Kennedy authored the opinion in favor of Frank Ricci and his fellow firefighters who sued the city of New Haven. "The city's action in discarding the tests violated (federal law)," the Supreme Court majority wrote Monday, adding that the city's "race-based rejection of the test results" could not be justified. The city argued its action was prompted by concern that disgruntled black firefighters would sue. But that reasoning didn't hold sway with the court's majority. "Fear of litigation alone cannot justify the city's reliance of race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," the court ruled.

Predictably, the court was split "... along its familiar ideological lines. Kennedy was joined by the four conservatives on the court in issuing the majority decision."

Then we have this observation:

The court's more liberal members joined Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's dissent which she read from the bench. "The white firefighters who scored high on New Haven's promotional exams understandably attract the court's sympathy," she said. "But they had no vested right to promotion."

Bader Ginsberg is correct. The white firefighters had no vested right to promotion. But that wasn't the argument.

The argument is this: Failing a demonstration that the test discriminated against minorities, the promotion of successful examinees should have been allowed.

No one demonstrated that the test was discriminatory. Rather, the city engaged in a discriminatory act by throwing out the results simply because the administration was afraid someone might try to argue that the test was discriminatory, via a law suit.

I have to wonder. Is Justice Ginsberg Bader's opinion based on rule of law, or on her rich experiences as a white Jewish woman? We already know the basis of Sotomayor's decision in this matter.
Tags: sotomayor  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Transformers' hidden political statement


Critics are hitting "Transformers" for racism - the gold-toothed little ghetto pimpster Transformer and his sidekick, who sound like refugees from Compton - and for sexist piggery - the little Transformer who humps the bimbo's leg.

But how many people noticed the comment about "... President Obama is being flown to a safe place" - that 'undisclosed location' somewhere deep within the continental US?

And how many people picked up on the National Security Advisor ripping a strip off the military, telling them - as the world was being pummeled by Evil Transformers - that we were going to negotiate and try to settle it diplomatically. Even though it is abundantly clear throughout the flick that there is no negotiating with those things.

Reality comes to Hollywood.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

King Mark

Sanford held his typical public meeting with the agency chiefs, but started with apologies and likened his confession and future to the biblical plight of King David. Sanford said King David fell mightily but picked up the pieces and built from there.

First, David threw himself at God's feet and begged for mercy and forgiveness. And he was still a jerk, God's pal or not. So far I'm not seeing a lot of Psalm 51 or 103 out of this tinkerbell in South Carolina. Superficial twit. Obviously his wife has both the brains and the balls in the outfit.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another motivational poster

Unfortunately, it's photoshopped ... but you gotta admire the sentiment:

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Motivational posters

Motivational posters:




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's 'foreign policy'


So ... we're going to 'dialogue' with the Iranian government?

Here's how those murdering thugs 'dialogue':

Baharestan Square

Massacre in Baharestan Square

Crackdown in Baharestan Square

How accurate are these reports? Dunno. Certainly there is violence and bloodshed, with protesters against the morally corrupt Iranian government being beaten and murdered.

As for the mainstream media and their resources ... we'll have to wait for them to finish gushing and fawning over the demise of Michael Jackson, the former singer who brought new meaning to the word "bizarre", before they get back to gushing and fawning over The Obamessiah ... with Iran as an afterthought, one of those irritating little distractors.

Speaking of which, Jonah Goldbert has a good commentary on the incredible vapidity of the mainstream media:

Some quick thoughts on Michael Jackson

an excerpt:

I know that Michael Jackson wasn’t convicted of the despicable crimes he was accused of. And that’s why he never went to jail. Three cheers for the majesty of the American legal system. But in my own personal view, he wasn’t exonerated either. Nor was he absolved of his crimes because he could sing, moonwalk, or sell 10 million records. (Though many of us suspect the money and fame he made from those things is precisely what kept him out of jail).

And, while I merely think he was a pedophile, I know he was not someone responsible parents should applaud, healthy children emulate, nor society celebrate.

And while we’re at it, his relatively early death wasn’t “tragic.” He was one of the richest people in the world. He spent his money on perpetual childhood and he was perpetually with children not his own.

Meanwhile, in the last ten days, we’ve seen or heard of remarkable people who’ve given their lives for freedom in Iran. We’ve heard of innocents killed because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. In the last decade, America has lost thousands of heroes in noble causes and thousands of innocent bystanders who were denied the simple joys of life through no fault of their own. Those deaths are tragic, and we're hard pressed to think of more than a handful of names to put with the long line of the dead.

If anything, Michael Jackson’s life, not his death, was tragic.


Meanwhile, the Iranians have done a Michael Jackson Merge:



and of course, no post on Obama's foreign policy would be complete without Michael Ramirez:

"...it's not like you're interrogating terrorists ..."

Tags: Iran  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »